October 2026
6.8 What this doesn't show
- No conviction or charge against any named politician in the Master case. Vorcaro has not been convicted. PF hypotheses (Havengate, Ciro's payments, Ibaneis's role, Moraes's contract edits) are investigative findings, and the people named contest them.
- It does not show the Master fraud was organised for the far right or for resource access. It shows a bank buying protection across the spectrum. The one far-right-specific thread, Havengate, is unproven.
- The 21 demands were made to Lula's government and rejected. They show US intent to tie minerals to politics, not Bolsonaro agreement. Flávio's camp has publicly offered alignment, but no deal exists.
- Rockbridge: a company registration and one person's reported role are not evidence of campaign financing. The PT's and Missão's allegations are unproven.
- Evangelical theology does not drive the minerals or trade decisions in the documents examined. The drivers there are US–China industrial strategy and US payments and platform interests.
- The Revelando episodes are campaign advocacy. Several of their specific claims were wrong or overstated (see
video-T3gZ6Nn7kZY.md, section 4).