October 2026
Changelog (v1 → v2)
- Upgraded to [V]/[V-s]:
- Vance–Yarvin quote (exact wording, from a court-filed transcript)
- Thiel's $15M to Protect Ohio Values (FEC/OpenSecrets dates) and the $15M→$20M to Masters's PAC
- Andreessen's "patron saints" list, which does name Nick Land, and Ray Kurzweil
- Trump's Ohel visit (7 Oct 2024)
- ICC sanctions (EO 14203, Khan, judges)
- Iran strikes (22 June 2025, Operation Midnight Hammer)
- Red heifer import (Sept 2022, Texas, Boneh Israel)
- Hegseth–CREC (AP)
- Epstein schedule entries (WSJ 2023, House Oversight document)
- Founders Fund → Tlon
- Pronomos → Praxis
- Thiel's NZ citizenship (12 days) and the Wānaka lodge refusals
- Sovereign Individual influence
- Haaretz settlement-funding investigation
- Palantir's ImmigrationOS contract
- Faith Office EO 14205
- CUFI's membership claim
- Land's 2012 essay
- AI policy executive orders (EO 14363 Genesis, EO 14365 state-law framework) and Stargate
- Liberation Day EO 14257
- Vance's Paris quote
- Kushner's Gaza deal role and the PIF panel objection
- Ben-Gvir's Temple Mount prayer
- Acosta's denial
- Corrected:
- Hegseth's title is now "Secretary of War" as a secondary title (EO 14347, 5 Sept 2025). The defense department's legal name is unchanged.
- The ICC sanctions covered Prosecutor Khan in Feb 2025, then four judges in June 2025, then more later. v1 just said "later extended to judges."
- The Acosta "belonged to intelligence" line is now marked as denied under oath (Sept 2025).
- Thiel–Praxis is narrowed to "via Pronomos Capital (Thiel-backed)." There's no direct personal investment documented.
- The AI Action Plan didn't itself preempt state laws. EO 14365 (Dec 2025) did the preemption push.
- Added:
- Thiel's second and third Antichrist series: Rome (date unconfirmed) and Nashville (Sept 28–Oct 19, 2026), where he criticised Obama and Pope Leo.
- A new section 3, "Murky and startling circumstances."
- Removed: the unsourced "lifted into ethnic-cabal narratives that she doesn't make" phrasing about Webb. It's replaced with her actual documented remark and her response.